What does Lane Kiffin’s departure mean for the Florida Gators?

Though I disagree with what he said in the last paragraph of this blog post, Ben Volin once again makes some excellent points: http://blogs.palmbeachpost.com/gatorbytes/2010/01/13/what-does-lane-kiffins-departure-mean-for-the-florida-gators/#more-3229

(Good article by Tony Barnhart here; I agree with what he has to say: http://blogs.ajc.com/barnhart-college-football/2010/01/13/tennessee-better-off-without-kiffin/ )

i dont know if its good or bad....some of those usc recruits my change back now.....but we now might get some volunteer recruits...as i was just reading i think we lost prater to USC for kitten

I'm not sure which I hate reading more, Volin's blog or that guy that keeps commenting, canesrule21.

I am not concerned if Lame Kitten "steals" a couple recruits. Whether or not he left UT for USC, we were not going to get all the best recruits. It's all part of the game. If we cannot sell the Gator program well enough to attract the best talent, then we should look at recruiting better. Period.

Lane leaving UT means nothing. Monte leaving UT means everything in my opinion.

One less Headache for Meyer.

shandsgator8 said:

Lane leaving UT means nothing. Monte leaving UT means everything in my opinion.

Click to expand...

Exactly. Without daddy, lane is worthless.

Apparently David Cutcliffe (former Ole Miss coach, now at Duke) is odd-on to replace Lame Kitten - this ought to make Peyton Manning happy: http://www.ajc.com/sports/report-cutcliffe-to-replace-275461.html